<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Signals to Search Engines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.acronym.com/keyworddriven/new-signals-to-search-engines.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.acronym.com/keyworddriven/new-signals-to-search-engines.html</link>
	<description>Expert Opinion from Search Leaders</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:06:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: AlchemyV</title>
		<link>http://www.acronym.com/keyworddriven/new-signals-to-search-engines.html#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>AlchemyV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keyworddriven.com/?p=238#comment-33</guid>
		<description>Hi Mike, we met years ago ago  directors dinner, and many of the things you mentioned then were mentioned in your recent white paper.  I think what you say makes plenty of sense.  Its all very well saying this, but Media land is only going to change the way its doing once a. clients (and us in media land) start seeing a whole load of universal search results push the organic stuff to page 2 and b. SEs stop paying as much attention to links.  I&#039;m all for the challenge of meeting the demands of universal search and social media - but lets face it - Google won&#039;t change their search results overnight will they?  Especially if Governments round the world decide to step in and tell google to &#039;put the algo back to where it was&#039; in order to maintain tax revenue. So why would medialand and clients change the subject from SEO?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mike, we met years ago ago  directors dinner, and many of the things you mentioned then were mentioned in your recent white paper.  I think what you say makes plenty of sense.  Its all very well saying this, but Media land is only going to change the way its doing once a. clients (and us in media land) start seeing a whole load of universal search results push the organic stuff to page 2 and b. SEs stop paying as much attention to links.  I&#8217;m all for the challenge of meeting the demands of universal search and social media &#8211; but lets face it &#8211; Google won&#8217;t change their search results overnight will they?  Especially if Governments round the world decide to step in and tell google to &#8216;put the algo back to where it was&#8217; in order to maintain tax revenue. So why would medialand and clients change the subject from SEO?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

